Core Humanities Seminar, spring 2002
Paper 1
For this exercise, you have a choice. You may either address the issues raised by the
in-class rewriting exercise, or write an analysis of passages from Behn and Equiano.
Option 1: write an account of what you did in our "translation"
(rewriting) exercise today (Monday). You should explain what you changed and why, using
evidence from the texts (quotations from Behns Oroonoko and Equianos Narrative)
to support your account of what you did. (I changed this sentence from Equiano to that
because Behn does this:
) As this is not a regular paper, you do not need an
introduction or conclusion, but should just jump right in to your analysis.
Option 2: Compare a passage from Behns Oroonoko to a passage from
Equianos Narrative. Suggested passages are below, or you are welcome (even
encouraged) to choose your own passages. (These may extend work youve done in either
your reading journal or your response papers.) As this is not a regular paper, you do not
need an introduction or conclusion, but should just jump right in to your analysis.
Think about the paper in three parts: a detailed discussion of each passage (approximately a page each), followed by a comparison (about a page). For each passage, it may be helpful to think about what the author means to convey, and how she or he goes about doing this. You should be addressing both the main claim (the goal, the "what") of the passage, and the techniques (the means, the "how") of the passage, and considering how these two aspects of the passage relate to each other. In the comparison section, you should then compare the two ways the authors achieve their effects.
Suggested passages:
Oroonoko: p. 33 (bottom paragraph, to top 34), p. 39 (bottom paragraph), p. 61 (top
paragraph), 76 (bottom paragraph, to top 77)
Equianos Narrative: p. 56 (middle paragraph), p. 83 (middle of page), p.
104-5, p. 139
Papers should be double-spaced, in a standard font, with standard margins, etc. Title
pages are not necessary.
Due in class Monday 2/4.