

The Holocaust Industry has been going strong for some time now. It relentlessly
reinvents itself and too frequently reduces the horror of the Final Solution by
using aesthetic conventions. It also makes significant money, and, if you're
Steven Spielberg, can reaffirm your career, vaulting you from the status of mere
blockbuster-maker to serious auteur.
The Holocaust itself, of
course, holds a central place in the post-20th-century Western consciousness. It
was a period of near-apocalyptic insanity, in which the basest metaphysical
prejudice (with all the ancillary rhetoric of racial purity and divine right
which came with it) combined with the mechanical and logistical means to achieve
extraordinary brutal ends.
And so, we tell and retell
the story in order to remember it and to know it (and, yes, to profit from it).
Yet, a peculiar paradox has arisen with the industry: the more we seem to
represent it, the more its singularly vile reality seems to slip away. The
various signifiers (the media) seem to supplant the event itself (9 million dead
bodies), circulating and being consumed. Theodore Adorno, who said a few useful
things about the culture industry, once famously commented, "To write poetry
after the Holocaust is barbaric." The barbarity, intentional and unintentional,
of the Holocaust as numbing commodity is a sad eventuality indeed.
It's in this context of
commodification and exhaustion of meaning that the Criterion Collection releases
one of the first documentary films dealing with the genocide, Alain Resnais'
short work, Night and Fog. Anyone familiar with Resnais' later fictional
works (particularly his masterworks, Hiroshima Mon Amour and the
temporally disjointed Last Year at Marienbad), will know that questions
of memory and the problematic process of "correctly" representing the past are
central themes for him. It's not surprising, therefore, that Night and Fog
is formally structured along lines of past and present, intercutting color film
sequences depicting a "present" day death camp (in this case, "present" means
the moment of the film's production, around 1954-1955) with historical black and
white footage of Nazi Germany (ranging from as early as 1933 to the end of the
war).
This intercutting breaks
up the otherwise linear timeline of the black and white sequences, by regularly
interjecting the present into the representation of the past. It works against
the strong tendency of traditional narrative film to organize events into
consistent wholes that mask through the techniques of continuity editing the
inherently fragmented reality (both spatially and temporally) of film
production. The film tells the story of the Holocaust in a particular way, one
that makes the process and manner of recalling at least as important as the
event being recalled.
This last point is subtle,
reinforced throughout by the voiceover narration (written by the novelist Jean
Cayrol, read by Michel Bouquet). As the black and white footage becomes
increasingly grim (graphic scenes of piles of emaciated dead bodies, huge rooms
filled with piles of shaved off hair, decapitated heads stacked neatly in large
buckets), the narrative moves from concrete historical exposition to more
ambiguous, philosophical concerns: Who is responsible? Why did this happen? Will
we allow it to happen again?
"Keeps watch." This is a
multiply determined phrase in Night and Fog, a combination of backward,
present, and forward looking gazes, encompassing history and future all in the
same gesture. The phrase is a mirror of the film's form, articulating in words
what the film speaks in structure, making Resnais' documentary into a kind of
primer for seeing the world dialectically.
But Resnais' documentary
is hardly optimistic about our abilities (individually and collectively) to
master its pedagogy. "We pretend [the Holocaust] all happened once, at a given
time and place," says the narrator. "We turn a blind eye to what surrounds us
and a deaf ear to humanity's never-ending cry." In other words, we treat the
event as a reified moment, rather than the result of a number of complicated,
intersecting historical trajectories.
And so we return to the
Holocaust Industry, where reification is the norm. The Holocaust is here the
signifier of Nazi insanity and malice, but rarely of global complicity in that
insanity. It's "why we fight," to recall Frank Capra's WWII documentaries, the
warrant for violent opposition, but rarely a reason to contemplate the
historical relations that allowed such an event to occur in the first place. The
distillation of evil, in the Industry's vision of the "Holocaust," is all too
often an abstraction, the evacuation of the reality of the event. Night and
Fog sees this future history of abstraction as all too real a possibility
and rails against it, a prescient observation, worth heeding today.
![]()
This is a copy of a film review, published on-line on August 11, 2003, which can
be found at:
http://www.popmatters.com/film/reviews/n/night-and-fog.shtml
I did not provide a direct link to this site because it's difficult to access.
(It keeps asking for a password, but if you keep pressing the enter key, you can
still access it without one.) I made this copy of the article solely for
easy student access.